Ghanaian President-elect John Dramani Mahama has responded strongly to remarks by Lawyer Martin Kpebu concerning ex-gratia payments.
This heated exchange has brought the controversial topic back into the national spotlight, with Mahama refusing to apologize for receiving what he was entitled to during his time in office.
During a recent interview, Lawyer Martin Kpebu challenged Mahama to refund the ex-gratia he received, arguing that doing so would set an example for others.
Kpebu’s suggestion was seen by many as a bold move, aimed at highlighting the need for reforms in how public officials are compensated after leaving office.
Mahama, however, was not pleased with the suggestion.
He sharply criticized Kpebu, saying, “You’re being silly by asking me to refund my ex-gratia.”
He went on to explain that the payments were legal and part of the system that had been in place for years.
“I didn’t create the system,” Mahama said. “These are benefits that every public servant is entitled to after service.
Why should I be singled out to return what is lawfully mine?”
The former president also clarified that he had never denied receiving the payment, countering claims that he might have been evasive on the matter. Instead, he shifted the conversation towards reforms.
“If we want to change the system, let’s do it the right way,” Mahama added.
“I have already said that if I return to power, I will scrap ex-gratia for future public officials.
But let us not make it seem like I have done something wrong by accepting what was due to me.”
Kpebu’s comments have sparked mixed reactions among Ghanaians.
While some believe Mahama should lead by example and refund the money, others argue that it is unfair to target him for something that is a standard practice.
The debate over ex-gratia reflects deeper frustrations among Ghanaians about public spending.
Many citizens are calling for a review of policies to ensure fairness and accountability.
As the discussion continues, Mahama’s strong words and commitment to reforms may shape the future of this controversial issue.
Source : m.dailyadvent.com